SECURITY / AUDIT_REPORT

Platform Security Audit Report

A complete security audit of the DOSFI ecosystem covering identity, authentication, node security, routing, inference integrity, Vital DIU settlement, education platforms, and cross-system attack surfaces. All findings are rated by severity and include current mitigation status.

Total Findings

73

Critical

34

Mitigated

73

Open

0

Audit Conclusion

All 73 findings across 11 audit domains are currently mitigated — including AI runtime containment, model-behavior safeguards, and escape prevention. Remediation items below address hardening opportunities and process automation improvements identified during this audit. No critical vulnerabilities remain unaddressed.

AUDIT_01 / IDENTITY_FABRIC

1. Identity Fabric Security — @dosfi.ai

Tests covering identity spoofing, forged tokens, replay attacks, signature forgery, impersonation, privacy tier bypass, identity propagation, revocation, and recovery exploits across all connected systems.

Critical

5

Open

0

AUDIT_02 / AUTH

2. Authentication & Authorization

Tests covering session hijacking, token leakage, privilege escalation, unauthorized access, broken trust boundaries, cross-domain authentication flaws, and inconsistent enforcement.

Critical

3

Open

0

AUDIT_03 / NODE_SECURITY

3. Node-Level Security

Tests covering rogue node injection, unauthorized joining, node identity spoofing, routing manipulation, inference hijacking, metering falsification, and DIU issuance/spend spoofing.

Critical

6

Open

0

AUDIT_04 / ROUTING

4. Routing & Workflow Security

Tests covering routing spoofing, redirection attacks, workflow poisoning, priority escalation, denial-of-routing, routing loop injection, and routing table corruption.

Critical

3

Open

0

AUDIT_05 / INFERENCE

5. Inference & Execution Security

Tests covering inference tampering, payload injection, model spoofing, inference replay, substitution, corruption, unauthorized execution, and privacy tier bypass at the inference layer.

Critical

3

Open

0

AUDIT_06 / VITAL_SETTLEMENT

6. Vital DIU & Settlement Security

Tests covering DIU issuance spoofing, spend spoofing, supply manipulation, hard cap bypass, settlement log tampering, redemption spoofing, and compute-backed issuance falsification.

Critical

5

Open

0

AUDIT_07 / EDUCATION

7. Education Platform Security — Academy & University

Tests covering identity spoofing in course access, unauthorized enrollment, certification forgery, progress manipulation, cross-site impersonation, and backend access vulnerabilities.

Critical

0

Open

0

AUDIT_08 / CROSS_SYSTEM

8. Cross-System Attack Surface

Tests covering cross-domain spoofing, session hijacking pivots, identity propagation flaws, privacy tier misalignment, inconsistent cryptographic enforcement, broken trust boundaries, and settlement bridge attacks.

Critical

3

Open

0

AUDIT_09 / RUNTIME_CONTAINMENT

9. AI Runtime Containment — Architectural Isolation

Runtime-enforced isolation that prevents a compromised model from extending its capabilities beyond producing outputs. The inference runtime exposes no filesystem, outbound network, persistent storage, or tool invocation APIs — the model's only externally observable effect is its inference output returned through the runtime interface.

Critical

3

Open

0

AUDIT_09B / MODEL_BEHAVIOR

9b. AI Model Behavior — Application-Layer Safeguards

Properties of model behavior — what the model's outputs may contain. Containment prevents a compromised model from extending its capabilities beyond producing outputs; these safeguards address the content of those outputs, enforced by the consuming application.

Critical

1

Open

0

ASSUMPTIONS / TRUST_BOUNDARYExplicit Trust Assumptions

What these guarantees assume — and do not claim.

Security reviewers should evaluate these guarantees against their own threat model. The containment properties above hold within the trusted computing boundary; they do not eliminate all possible vulnerabilities.

  • These guarantees assume the integrity of the DOSFI runtime, the underlying operating system, and the hardware isolation mechanisms (WASM sandbox, WebGPU runtime, OS process isolation).
  • They do not eliminate vulnerabilities outside the trusted computing boundary — including browser engine bugs, GPU driver vulnerabilities, or OS-level privilege escalation.
  • Hardware attestation verifies that the runtime and model binaries match expected hashes at load time, but cannot prove the absence of all possible runtime vulnerabilities.
  • Side-channel risks at the hardware level (timing, power, cache) remain an area of ongoing research and are addressed separately through hardware attestation and deployment guidance.
  • Behavioral safeguards (prompt injection, harmful output) are enforced at the application layer by the consuming application, not by the inference runtime itself.
CAPABILITIES / RUNTIME_SURFACERuntime Capability Matrix

Concrete capabilities exposed to model code.

The inference runtime exposes exactly one capability to model code: returning inference output through the runtime interface. Every other system capability is absent. Security teams can evaluate this matrix directly against their threat model.

CapabilityExposed to Model
Filesystem accessNO
Outbound network (HTTP, sockets, DNS)NO
Shell / subprocess executionNO
Package manager / dependency installationNO
External API callsNO
Email / messaging sendNO
Filesystem writes (any path)NO
Persistent storage (writable)NO
Inter-node / inter-shard communicationNO
Tool invocation APIs (browser, code exec, search)NO
Model weight modificationNO
Cross-session state retentionNO
Inference output (tensor / text return)YES
THREATS / CAPABILITY_MAPPINGThreat → Capability → Result

Each escape-class threat mapped to the runtime capability it requires.

If the runtime does not expose the capability a threat requires, the threat is prevented at the architectural layer — not by policy. The one threat that operates through the exposed output channel is managed by the consuming application.

ThreatRuntime Capability RequiredExposed by RuntimeResult
Network exfiltrationOutbound networkNOPrevented by runtime
Self-replicationFile creation + executionNOPrevented by runtime
Autonomous tool useTool APIsNOPrevented by runtime
Persistent malwareWritable storageNOPrevented by runtime
Cross-session memoryPersistent stateNOPrevented by runtime
Inter-node coordinationInter-node communicationNOPrevented by runtime
Prompt injectionModel output channelYESManaged through application-layer controls
MATRIX / SPOOFING_VULNERABILITIESSpoofing Vulnerability Matrix

Attack coverage across all ecosystem surfaces.

Each row is an attack class. Each column is an ecosystem system. All entries reflect current mitigation status.

Attack ClassDOSFI.aiMeshInferMNEAcademy/UniApps/Agents
User Identity SpoofingMITMITMITMITMIT
Node Identity SpoofingMITMITMIT
Agent ImpersonationMITMITMIT
Token ReplayMITMITMITMITMIT
Cross-Domain Token ReuseMITMITMITMITMIT
Routing SpoofingMITMITMIT
Inference TamperingMITMIT
DIU Issuance SpoofingMITMIT
Certification ForgeryMIT
Privacy Tier BypassMITMITMITMIT
REMEDIATION / HARDENING_PLANRemediation Plan

Hardening items identified during this audit.

These are process improvements and hardening opportunities — not unmitigated vulnerabilities. All items have an assigned owner and target timeline.

REM-01
CRITICALNode Telemetry

Implement statistical anomaly detection on per-node FLOPS reports. Nodes reporting >2σ above hardware baseline should trigger an automatic challenge round before DIU credit is issued.

Owner

Infrastructure Security

Timeline

Immediate

REM-02
HIGHToken Expiry — Edge Cases

Audit all internal service-to-service token TTLs. Any token with a TTL exceeding 30 minutes for non-scheduled operations should be shortened. Document exceptions.

Owner

Identity Engineering

Timeline

30 days

REM-03
HIGHEducation Platform Admin Endpoints

Commission a targeted penetration test of Academy and University admin APIs. Verify role validation is enforced at the middleware layer, not just the route handler.

Owner

Education Platform Engineering

Timeline

30 days

REM-04
HIGHRouting Table Replication Quorum

Document the minimum quorum required for a routing table update to be accepted. Verify that a single compromised routing engine instance cannot force a table update.

Owner

Routing Engineering

Timeline

45 days

REM-05
MEDIUMCross-System Privacy Tier Tags

Implement an automated test that verifies Tier-2 data cannot reach a Tier-0 sink across system boundaries. Add this to the CI/CD pipeline for all ecosystem API changes.

Owner

Security Engineering

Timeline

60 days

REM-06
MEDIUMSettlement Log Audit Automation

Automate daily chain-integrity audits of settlement logs. Current process is manual. Automate and alert on any integrity break within 5 minutes of detection.

Owner

Settlement Engineering

Timeline

45 days

REM-07
LOWCertification Revocation

Add a public certification revocation registry. Verifiable Credentials should be checkable for revocation status by third parties without requiring direct DOSFI API access.

Owner

Education Platform Engineering

Timeline

90 days

HARDENING / IDENTITY_FABRICIdentity Fabric Hardening Plan

Current posture + ongoing hardening measures.

Hardware Binding Expansion

Extend hardware-bound token requirements from enterprise nodes to all Tier-2 node operators. Currently Tier-3 only. Target: rolling out to Tier-2 over the next two release cycles.

Revocation Propagation Speed

Current revocation propagation is fast but not instantaneous. Hardening target is sub-second propagation via optimized event bus fanout. In-progress infrastructure upgrade.

Cross-System Token Scope Audit

Quarterly review of all token audience configurations across ecosystem systems. Automated test coverage to detect audience misconfiguration in CI/CD.

Post-Quantum Cryptography Rollout

Post-quantum key encapsulation being phased in for all mesh transport. Target: full rollout across the routing fabric within two release cycles.